.png)
<aside> <img src="/icons/briefcase_gray.svg" alt="/icons/briefcase_gray.svg" width="40px" /> THE BRIEF In Winter 2024, as part of a UX studio class, my team of 3 was tasked with generating innovative product concepts for a previously successful brand that is now struggling.
</aside>
A variety of up-and-coming competitors are chipping away at the large user base of the dominant book cataloging platform. These new networks market themselves as direct alternatives to Goodreads.
Goodreads has several key advantages over their cataloging competitors, such as a large audience, vast review backlog, and pre-built literary network.
It’s not enough. Readers want more out of Goodreads: a unique social connection and a motivator to read.
Strengthening social engagement between friends on Goodreads and motivating increased reading and logging through refreshing core experiences that encourage users to spend more time on the platform.
.png)
The primary threat to Goodreads is users migrating to competitors platforms. So, we reached out to active Goodreads users to understand what they love about the platform and what may cause them to switch to a competitor.
<aside> <img src="/icons/earthquake_green.svg" alt="/icons/earthquake_green.svg" width="40px" /> Readers prefer Goodreads because of the large existing userbase connecting them to their friends and the large review backlog, but it’s very difficult to tap into those networks.
</aside>
<aside> <img src="/icons/checklist_green.svg" alt="/icons/checklist_green.svg" width="40px" /> Readers feel Goodreads only indirectly contributes to reading (such as through logging) and wish there were more direct motivators to build habits and read more.
</aside>



